illiac786 5 hours ago > In Firefox Labs, there are is an option to enable JPEG XL support, a super-optimised version of JPEG that is gaining traction (despite Google’s intransigence).
anon1395 5 hours ago Why did JPEG XL get removed in the first place? midzer 5 hours ago Because Chrom* removed it. anon1395 3 hours ago Firefox is independent of Chromium, why would they remove it? illiac786 2 hours ago Unclear, imho I think Mozilla thought jxl had zero chances of chrome was not supporting it and hence they gave it up.Or, they were using the same google-developed library.
midzer 5 hours ago Because Chrom* removed it. anon1395 3 hours ago Firefox is independent of Chromium, why would they remove it? illiac786 2 hours ago Unclear, imho I think Mozilla thought jxl had zero chances of chrome was not supporting it and hence they gave it up.Or, they were using the same google-developed library.
anon1395 3 hours ago Firefox is independent of Chromium, why would they remove it? illiac786 2 hours ago Unclear, imho I think Mozilla thought jxl had zero chances of chrome was not supporting it and hence they gave it up.Or, they were using the same google-developed library.
illiac786 2 hours ago Unclear, imho I think Mozilla thought jxl had zero chances of chrome was not supporting it and hence they gave it up.Or, they were using the same google-developed library.
> In Firefox Labs, there are is an option to enable JPEG XL support, a super-optimised version of JPEG that is gaining traction (despite Google’s intransigence).
Why did JPEG XL get removed in the first place?
Because Chrom* removed it.
Firefox is independent of Chromium, why would they remove it?
Unclear, imho I think Mozilla thought jxl had zero chances of chrome was not supporting it and hence they gave it up.
Or, they were using the same google-developed library.